green-building-newsheader image
0 Helpful?

President Trump Imposes Tariffs on Solar Panels

New tariffs on imported PV cells and modules are lower than what had been sought by two U.S. manufacturers

Posted on Jan 23 2018 by Scott Gibson

President Trump has announced the imposition of new tariffs on imported photovoltaic(PV) Generation of electricity directly from sunlight. A photovoltaic cell has no moving parts; electrons are energized by sunlight and result in current flow. (PVPhotovoltaics. Generation of electricity directly from sunlight. A photovoltaic (PV) cell has no moving parts; electrons are energized by sunlight and result in current flow.) cells and panels, acceding to the request of two foreign-owned companies with facilities in the U.S., Suniva and SolarWorld. The tariffs were vigorously opposed by a trade group representing the U.S. solar industry.

The new duties start at 30% but will decline over four years to 15%. In each of those four years, the first 2.5 gigawatts of imported solar cells won't be subject to the tariff, The New York Times reported, a move designed to help PV module manufacturers in the U.S. retain access to cheap cells.

Trump acted after getting recommendations from the U.S. International Trade Commission, which conducted hearings on the request from Suniva and SolarWorld. Also on Monday, Trump ordered new tariffs on imported washing machines.

The tariffs are part of a trade broadside from the Trump administration that also includes his withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and negotiations to rewrite the North American Free Trade Agreement to make the agreement more favorable to the U.S.

Some experts worried that the protectionist moves would touch off more widespread trade disputes. Chad Brown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics told The Washington Post, "There's a real chance that this opens the floodgates."

The Times reported that more than 95% of solar panels sold in the U.S. are imported, half of them from Malaysia and South Korea. China has became a powerhouse in solar cell and module manufacturing, with its share of global cell production rising from 7% in 2005 to 61% in 2012, The Post reported, while as many as 30 U.S. manufacturers of PV modules have gone out of business.

Low prices on imported solar cells and panels hurt U.S. manufacturers, but they also have driven down the cost of solar installations by 70% since 2010. And in the wake of the decision, the Solar Energy Industries Association warned that 23,000 Americans who install PV systems would lose their jobs this year, while billions in solar investments would be delayed or canceled.

In a statement, SEIA President Abigail Ross said the tariffs would not be enough to keep either Suniva or SolarWorld afloat and would damage a sector of the economy that has been booming.

SEIA included a statement from Tony Clifford, the chief development officer at Standard Solar, a SEIA member. “It boggles my mind that this president — any president, really — would voluntarily choose to damage one of the fastest-growing segments of our economy,” he said. “This decision is misguided and denies the reality that bankrupt foreign companies will be the beneficiaries of an American taxpayer bailout.”

GTM Research predicted that the tariffs would mean an 11% drop in U.S. solar installations over the next five years, a reduction of 7.6 gigawatts of installed capacity through 2022.


Tags: , , , , , ,

Image Credits:

  1. University of Salford via Flickr

1.
Jan 26, 2018 10:47 AM ET

Edited Jan 26, 2018 10:48 AM ET.

Free Market Proves Trump's Solar Tariff Nothing But A Job Killer
by J M

"First Solar invested more than $1 billion in researching and developing the cad-tel spray over the course of two decades. Its success upended the business of solar panel production even before the Trump administration announced tariffs on overseas solar hardware on Jan. 22.
...
The panels coming off the new line in Ohio are triple the size of First Solar’s previous model and produce 244 percent more power at a manufacturing cost of as little as 20¢ per watt, about 30 percent less than the cheapest Chinese equivalent. The advantage widens in hot, humid, and low-light conditions. “They have a great new product and a significant cost advantage for at least a couple years,” says Jay Rhame, a portfolio manager at Reaves Asset Management, which has invested in First Solar."

From Bloomberg (Sorry, no URL. Terrible spam filter here routinely false positively flags URLs as spam and won't allow you to post them)


Register for a free account and join the conversation


Get a free account and join the conversation!
Become a GBA PRO!